timescale.info
Sign inSign up

Challenger: a causal factor analysis example

A worked Events and Causal Factors (ECF) teaching chart of the 28 January 1986 Challenger mishap, based on the Rogers Commission report. The history is real; the selection, CF numbering, link explanations and verification questions are this example’s educational analysis, not an official NASA ECF chart or a new investigation.

Start here

  1. Read MISHAP and its stack for the outcome, evidence limits and analytical summary.
  2. Zoom to 28 January 1986, 11:38–11:40 EST for the flight sequence. Zoom further to distinguish the final millisecond-spaced observations. The stored origin is 11:38:00.010 EST, taken from the report’s T0 ignition-command entry.
  3. Pan back to 27 January, 20:45–23:45 EST to inspect the launch decision. Open the three CF condition markers and use Related to to follow their connections.
  4. Open T+2.733 and compare its two dashed hypothesis cards with the dashed UNRESOLVED duration band before first flame. They remain alternatives; do not combine them into a confirmed account. The shared band marks an evidence gap, not a measured lifetime of either mechanism.
  5. Open the proposed corrective-action entries and identify what evidence would be required to verify effectiveness. The example does not claim those actions were completed.

The causal factor analysis suite in use

FeatureMeaning here
Process rectanglesSelected primary events; chronology is not automatically causation.
EllipsesConditions, including the red CF-1, CF-2 and CF-3 contributing-factor annotations.
Red diamondThe mishap reference within the rapid breakup sequence.
Document symbols / blueRecords, measurements and supporting evidence.
Purple document entriesRecommended controls and verification questions; not completed actions.
StacksEvidence, condition summaries and analysis attached to a parent. They inherit its time; these retrospective notes are not newly timed historical events.
Dashed stack entries and duration outlineTwo alternative mechanism hypotheses and their shared uncertain interval; neither is promoted to a finding.
Arrowed arcsEvent-to-event reading sequence or factor-to-effect progression. Open the originating entity’s notes for the explicitly named connection type and rationale.
Arcs without arrowheadsSupporting evidence or context, not causal assertions.

All five suite plugins are enabled from the live official Causal factor analysis v2 manifest: Moment stacks, Moment shapes v3 (ellipses), Moment colors, Presumptive outline and Relationship arrows. Sources, date context, rich notes and hover helpers support inspection. The software displays the analysis; it does not determine causes.

Boundaries and evidence discipline

The direct physical failure, underlying design vulnerability, environmental condition and organizational contributing cause are kept distinct. CF-1 is the joint/seal vulnerability; CF-2 is cold-dependent seal response; CF-3 is the failure to carry critical technical information through the launch decision. The report supports these relationships; this chart’s grouping is interpretive. No single numerical causal weight or exhaustive set of root causes is claimed.

Times are displayed in EST (UTC−05:00). Flight-table milliseconds are stored as exact rational seconds. Day-dated memoranda use midnight solely as an anchor; approximate testimony times, inferred mechanisms and editorial band boundaries say so in Dating context. The MISHAP marker uses a documented cloud observation within breakup, not an exact time of crew death. Solid outlines mean the reported observation or finding is supported, not that all timing is exact.

Arrows are display metadata on ordinary relationships. The platform’s relationships remain undirected and unlabeled; their connection type, reasoning and supporting sources are written in the linked entities’ notes and analysisLinks metadata. No causal inference is generated by the plugin. The proposed controls map to the Commission’s recommendations; their completion and effectiveness are outside this example’s scope.

Primary sources

Every event, condition band and stack entry also carries its own references. No invented interviews, records or historical facts are presented as evidence.

Media

Cover: NASA photograph of Challenger on the crawler before STS-51-L; public domain (PD-USGov-NASA). Wikimedia Commons file and license.

Camera evidence: NASA, first visible flame at T+58.788 s; public domain (PD-USGov-NASA). Wikimedia Commons file and license. This image is attached to the first-flame evidence stack so the main event and condition symbols remain readable.

26 moments · 1985-07-31T00:00:00-05:00 CE – 1986-01-28T11:39:50.01-05:00 CE · by @athan · @athan

T+73.618 · Last telemetry received

  • evidence

The report gives T+73.618 as the last telemetry reception. Ending data does not define an exact time of crew death. This endpoint is useful for distinguishing an observation-system boundary from the physical outcome. **Sources:** [Flight](https://www.nasa.gov/history/rogersrep/v1ch3.htm). **Next in the selected sequence: About T+110 s · Range safety destroys the boosters.** Post-mishap chronology; this does not identify an initiating cause.

Date precision
Commission flight-event table (Vol. I, pp. 37–39); source precision is milliseconds. T0 = 16:38:00.010 UTC / 11:38:00.010 EST. Exact storage does not imply zero measurement uncertainty.

Sources

Related

Open T+73.618 · Last telemetry received in the timeline